Posted by: holdenlee | August 1, 2015

Media consumption, 7/26-8/1


* = found particularly interesting

  •  Podcasts
    • 99% Invisible
      • Automation paradox*: 2-part series on automation.
        • 170 Children of the magenta – How automation has changed airplane safety (no question it increases safety, but automation can lead to incompetence – pilots being too reliant)
        • 171 Johnnycab: A world with self-driving cars. How would cities change?
      • 172 On location: on the Bradbury building, a film icon in Los Angeles
      • 173 Awareness: Ribbons for causes – it started with AIDS. How to do it: get the ribbons in a lot of high-profile places, and then tell people it’s for AIDS awareness
      • 174 From the sea, freedom: Micronations
      • 169 Freud’s couch
    • Freakonomics:
    • TED radio hour
      • Finite* (innovation comes out of scarcity; rainforests contain a wealth of medical knowledge that we haven’t valued and have turned away from; antibiotics should be viewed as a scarce resource because they create resistance)
      • Transformation
  • Following Slate star codex*. http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/07/28/non-dual-awareness/ (Things like minimum wage, tenure, and medical school admission create “duality”: a gap between those who get it vs. those who don’t, with similar consequences), http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/13/debunked-and-well-refuted/ (People misuse the word “debunk” to refer to literature that opposes their beliefs, rather than is publicly dismissed; often both sides claim they “debunked” each other). Lots of links. It’s very draining to sift through lots of media to find interesting things, so a curated list of link is gold.
  • Glanced at first 2 chapters of Experimental mathematics (website). Seems to be a lot of interesting math problems to do here, though I mostly just read the notes on doing math:
    • Hardy and Littlewood’s 4 axioms for collaboration:

      The first [axiom] said that when one wrote to the other (they often preferred to exchange thoughts in writing instead of orally), it was completely indifferent whether what they said was right or wrong. As Hardy put it, otherwise they could not write completely as they pleased, but would have to feel a certain responsibility thereby. The second axiom was to the effect that, when one received a letter from the other, he was under no obligation whatsoever to read it, let alone answer it, – because, as they said, it might be that the recipient of the letter would prefer not to work at that particular time, or perhaps that he was just then interested in other problems….The third axiom was to the effect that, although it did not really matter if they both thought about the same detail, still, it was preferable that they should not do so. And, finally, the fourth, and perhaps most important axiom, stated that it was quite indifferent if one of them had not contributed the least bit to the contents of a paper under their common name; otherwise there would constantly arise quarrels and difficulties in that now one, and now the other, would oppose being named co-author.“

    • Observation vs. proof in math (p. 11)

      I have myself always thought of a mathematician as in the first instance an observer, a man who gazes at a distant range of mountains and notes down his observations… proofs are what Littlewood and I call gas, rhetorical flourishes designed to affect psychology, pitcures on the board in the lecture, devices to stimulate the imagination of pupils. – G H. Hardy

    • Site + article on Escher: http://escherdroste.math.leidenuniv.nl/. What an Escher picture has to do with elliptic curves.
  • Curiosity – thought about this after listening to From Curiosity to Discovery (TED radio hour) a while back. Curiosity is an important ingredient to a fulfilling life and yet is not talked about/encouraged in society. Picked up Curious, Ian Leslie and A Curious Mind, Brian Grazer.
    Snippets from the intro:

    No one had thought to let him in on a secret: “I was suddenly seeing that the world is incredibly interesting… The closer you look at anything, the more interesting it gets. But nobody tells you this.”

    For most of Western history, it has been regarded as at best a distraction, at worst a poison, corrosive to the soul and to society… curiosity is deviant.
    [The Renaissance happened was a shift where society realized it was good to ask questions.]

    [the] new challenge is to make people hungry to learn, question, and create…. how to instill a culture of inquiry and critical thinking into their educational systems.

    Curiosity is more state than trait: we can arrange our lives to stoke our curiosity or quash it.

  • An interesting talk by Nisheeth Vishnoi on thinking about evolution using computer science. Papers quite readable.
  • LLL algorithm, notes and slides. (One application is finding algebraic dependenciess, see Experimental mathematics above.
  • Started reading Game of Thrones.
  • Watched up to episode 11 of My Little Pony
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: